Quinta-feira, 2 de Setembro de 2010

Compromise by the UN will open a dangerous precedent

By Vasco Martins

 

A UN draft report leaked to the French newspaper Le Monde is creating a firestorm in Kigali, which now threatens to stop supporting UN peace-keeping missions and has already devised a contingency plan for withdrawal from Sudan, in case the UN publishes this polemic report. The UN draft report accuses the Tutsi-led Rwandan army of having targeted and murdered tens of thousands of ethnic Hutus in neighbouring DR Congo between 1996 and 1997, a crime which may amount to genocide. The timeline in question is limited to the First Congo War, which was largely a consequence of the 1994 Rwandan genocide and of the displacement of approximately 2 million Hutus, including Interhamwe, towards the DRC in fear of Tutsi retaliation.

The Rwandan leadership is dismissing this report as being an “amateurish NGO job”, according to President Paul Kagame. Nevertheless, if indeed the Tutsi-led Rwandan army was involved in the killing of ethnic Hutus, the entire credibility of the post-1994 Tutsi plight will be shattered and unappealing from the international point of view. Such a situation would certainly limit the international credibility of recently re-elected President Paul Kagame and possibly even merit that a case be brought before the International Criminal Court, besides constraining the freedom of action and living space of Rwanda.

Rwanda is one of the biggest contributors of peacekeeping forces and a central actor in the region. However, the UN would suffer the biggest loss if it crumbles under pressure from Rwanda. Le Monde quoted an unnamed UN source claiming that Ban  Ki-moon had warned UN Human Rights Chief Navi Pillay against using the word ‘genocide’ in referring to Rwandan forces, thus sending the message that support for internationally unwanted peace-keeping missions in Africa’s ‘hot spots’ may serve as a trade-off to avoid accusations of genocide.

If the UN folds under pressure from Kigali and does not publish this report, a precedent will be opened where international condemnation can be avoided if one provides essential support in terms of peace-keeping to regions lacking such initiatives. This of course, is a minefield for the UN. Support for United Nations peacekeeping missions should neither excuse nor disregard evidence or accusations of genocide, no matter how great the losses in terms of support for its missions.

The African continent and the Great Lakes region specifically will most likely be involved in more violent conflict in the future. While it is true that the UN and the African Union lack the tools and human resources to avoid or even control such conflicts, backing down from genocide accusations in favour of continuing support from Rwanda is a compromise Ban Ki-moon should never be willing to make.

 

Do you wish to subscribe our publications, free of charge?

publicado por IPRIS às 00:02
link do post | favorito
partilhar
Sábado, 24 de Julho de 2010

Rwanda, the day that never came

By Vasco Martins

 

This August will mark the legislative elections in Rwanda, which were promised to be free and fair by RPF President Paul Kagame. Yet, mysterious deaths and accounts of missing people have been shadowing the electoral procedure.

As the first campaign rally started, Democratic Green Party Vice-President Andre Rwisereka was being buried, after having been found brutally decapitated in the south of country. Other reports account missing journalists, several politically motivated arrests and even the assassination of a former army General. What happened to the saviour of the Rwandan 1994 genocide?

The answer is that Paul Kagame has been in a down spiral ever since. His involvement in the second civil war of the Democratic Republic of Congo and the disappearing of prominent people across the country has cast serious doubts about his rule. In a country tragically marked by ethnic conflict and genocide, the path towards peace and stability is always hard and bumpy. However, embracing classical African systems of one-man party while cracking down the opposition and sponsoring ethnic conflict in neighbouring countries is not the way to recover from the violence of the 1990’s. Indeed, if Rwanda had a long road ahead, Paul Kagame’s regime seems to be taking steps backwards, instead of nurturing the free democratic process a complicated ethnic map like Rwanda’s requires.

 

Do you wish to subscribe our publications, free of charge?

publicado por IPRIS às 00:01
link do post | favorito
partilhar

More about IPRIS


ver perfil

seguir perfil

. 1 seguidor

Search

Outubro 2013

Dom
Seg
Ter
Qua
Qui
Sex
Sab
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31

Subscrever por e-mail

A subscrição é anónima e gera, no máximo, um e-mail por dia.

Recent Posts

Compromise by the UN will...

Rwanda, the day that neve...

Archives

Outubro 2013

Setembro 2013

Agosto 2013

Julho 2013

Junho 2013

Maio 2013

Abril 2013

Março 2013

Fevereiro 2013

Janeiro 2013

Dezembro 2012

Novembro 2012

Agosto 2012

Julho 2012

Junho 2012

Maio 2012

Abril 2012

Março 2012

Fevereiro 2012

Janeiro 2012

Dezembro 2011

Novembro 2011

Outubro 2011

Setembro 2011

Agosto 2011

Julho 2011

Junho 2011

Maio 2011

Abril 2011

Março 2011

Fevereiro 2011

Janeiro 2011

Dezembro 2010

Novembro 2010

Outubro 2010

Setembro 2010

Agosto 2010

Julho 2010

Junho 2010

tags

todas as tags

blogs SAPO

subscrever feeds